![]() |
When Judge James Donato of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California entered a scathing review of the NFL Disability Plan’s abuse of discretion when he granted summary judgment in favor of Charles Dimry in March 2018. Dimry’s court victory was considered a huge win not only for Dimry, but for other retired players whose disability had been denied based solely on Plan doctors retained by the Bert Bell Pete Roselle Benefits Plan, but in a shocking twist, Dimry is back in court, again seeking benefits because, according to his complaint, the Plan “strongly disagreed” with Judge Donato. |
![]() |
SEC Sues Lawyer for Defrauding Cognitively Impaired Ex-NFLers |
On August 28, the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a complaint in the Northern District of Florida detailing unbridled fraud against cognitively impaired retired NFL players by a lawyer who once represented them. |
NFL “Disagrees” with Federal Judge and Continues to Deny Benefits to Charles Dimry
Permanent link to this article: https://advocacyforfairnessinsports.org/2019/09/01/nfl-disagrees-with-federal-judge-and-continues-to-deny-benefits-to-charles-dimry/