While the NFL Concussion Settlement is fund for payment of claims to for compensation of former player suffering from neurocognitive impairment, the fund for class counsel compensation is not. While the NFL is acutely aware of what it’s spending, and fighting claims with a fury, Co-Lead Class Counsel Chris Seeger seems to take no issue with spending with abandon. In a motion filed Thursday, attorney Lance Lubel asks the court to deny Seeger’s most recent fee petition and put him on a budget before there’s no money left.
Tag: Christopher Seeger
Permanent link to this article: https://advocacyforfairnessinsports.org/nfl-concussion-settlement/did-seeger-break-the-nfl-concussion-settlement-bank/
On January 22, attorney Patrick Tighe of X1 Law filed a motion asking Judge Anita Brody to reconsider her recent ruling on the generally consistent concussion settlement provision.
Permanent link to this article: https://advocacyforfairnessinsports.org/nfl-concussion-settlement/law-firm-asks-judge-to-reconsider-nfl-concussion-settlement-ruling/
Two important briefs have been filed in the #NFL Concussion Settlement. One is an explosive brief that reads as an expose on quickly depleted common benefit funds meant to pay class attorney fees for the 65-year term of the settlement. In objection to Co-Lead Class Counsel Christopher Seeger’s most recent fee petition, attorney Lance Lubel …
Permanent link to this article: https://advocacyforfairnessinsports.org/2019/01/25/nfl-concussion-settlement-updates/
The NFL Concussion Settlement has been anything but an easy process for the neurologically impaired class of retired football players. As of December 27 – ten months after the claims process began – a meager 13% — 206 monetary awards out of 1913 filed claims. As an observer noted, if claims continue to be processed at this rate, it will take approximately 4 years to process the current case load – and that doesn’t even account for the additional claims that will be filed.
Permanent link to this article: https://advocacyforfairnessinsports.org/nfl-concussion-settlement/the-faqs-about-nfl-concussion-settlement-claims/
Permanent link to this article: https://advocacyforfairnessinsports.org/nfl-concussion-settlement/nfl-concussion-settlement-baseline-assessment-program/
On December 1, a proposed document of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) was posted via Electronic Court Filing (ECF) to the NFL Concussion Settlement docket. The purpose of the FAQ document is to aid the neurologically impaired football players who are class members to the settlement in understanding its terms and filing their claims. During the enrollment period for the settlement, when retired NFL players had to make a choice between enrollment in the settlement, opting out, or ignoring it all together, in order to encourage enrollment Co-Lead Class Counsel Christopher Seeger, along with Claims Administrator Brown Greer portrayed the enrollment and claims processes as “simple.” They encouraged retirees to not hire independent counsel for this reason. They were told if they had a qualifying diagnosis their claims would be approved, and a 30-60 day window was referenced as an estimated approval time. As a result, approximately 20,000 retired players or their representatives registered for the program, including many who had previously objected or opted out.
Permanent link to this article: https://advocacyforfairnessinsports.org/nfl-concussion-settlement/the-facts-about-nfl-concussion-settlement-faqs/
In September, Harvard Law Professor William B. Rubenstein was appointed by Judge Anita Brody to weigh in on controversies surrounding attorney fees, including a 5% hold back that Co-Lead Class Counsel Christopher Seeger requisitioned as payment for future work in settlement implementation.
In a well-reasoned 47-page report, Professor Rubenstein recommended against withholding the additional 5% from Class Members monetary awards and advised a 15% cap on contingency feels from independently retained counsel. Judge Brody has given a January 3 deadline for responses to the expert opinion.
Withholding 5% of every award is unreasonable
Prior to Professor Rubenstein’s report, every other attorney who publicly expressed an opinion on the subject, as well as members of the class of retired NFL players expressed opposition to the proposed 5% holdback. Professor Rubenstein agreed. As the professor noted, Seeger felt that the $112.5 million common benefit (of which Seeger claims over $70 million) should go to pay for securing of the settlement and the 5% for implementation of it, but as Rubenstein said, “Class Counsel bear the burden of proving the need for a 5% set-aside, but their artificial bifurcation of settlement and implementation – and hence the justification for the 5% set-aside – fails to meet that burden for at least six reasons.”
Permanent link to this article: https://advocacyforfairnessinsports.org/nfl-concussion-settlement/harvard-law-professor-advises-concussion-settlement-court-to-cap-attorney-fees-eliminate-5-award-holdbacks/
Essential Sports & Sports Law News Week in Review 12/10/17 ?Read of the Week: Compelling read:
Forget About Colin Kaepernick; I Think I’m Done With the NFL Just Because I Don’t Want to Watch Someone Die https://t.co/vw8Sg50Fk7 via @verysmartbros — Sheilla Dingus (@SheillaDingus) December 9, 2017 ⚖️Litigation Lane: NFL Concussion Settlement …
Permanent link to this article: https://advocacyforfairnessinsports.org/2017/12/10/the-blitz-12-10-17/
Again. . . November 28, 2017
Sheilla Dingus In a grand webinar style conference on February 8, 2017, over which Judge Anita Brody presided, Co-Lead Class Counsel Christopher Seeger presented an impressive PowerPoint presentation in which he heralded the many benefits of the settlement that was beginning its …
Permanent link to this article: https://advocacyforfairnessinsports.org/nfl-concussion-settlement/christopher-seeger-opposes-motion-to-benefit-nfl-concussion-settlement-class/
Many wonder if they or the retired players will ever be paid November 21, 2017
Sheilla Dingus Andrew Brandt famously said, “There will be lawyers.” This statement is true and could actually be quite an understatement when it comes the NFL’s Concussion Settlement. On the surface one might think an uncapped settlement that …
Permanent link to this article: https://advocacyforfairnessinsports.org/nfl-concussion-settlement/even-attorneys-feel-the-brunt-of-chris-seegers-questionable-decisions/